Tuesday, June 19, 2012


Journal 3

In a Different Voice by Carol Gilligan was a very interesting read.  In class and in the readings, we have been noting all aspects and situations of minorities mainly by racial and ethnic identity.  What people can sometimes forget is that women are often seen as minorities as well. Equality for both minorities and women have, at some points in time and culture, been hard to come by.

In the reading, the author makes distinguishing points about how men and women view morality. There were studies with boys and girls on how they view morality and how they deal with it.  What was found was that males viewed morality logically and used reasoning to come to terms with certain aspects of morality.  Females, on the other hand, were more “sensitive” to morality and used personal experiences or relationships.  This was deemed unsuitable to the male character and was therefore proclaimed a weaker approach to the subject of morality.

It seems that since the beginning of recorded history, it is the male that is seen as dominant over the female.  Even if there was a female power figure, it did not happen without some sort of opposition.  How males approach ideas and situations has long been seen as the “right” way with the female perspective not being favored.  Therefore, it seems that whatever males do is what is widely accepted as the correct way.  This can be attributed to all subject matters, in that females are weaker and to be viewed as different.

In all of my history classes, I always learned about women suffering for some form of equal rights whether it be to vote or to hold some form of power.  This is not unlike the situation of minorities in the racial/ethnic sense.  Women have long been seen as the weaker human specimen and have not been able to hold equal rights with men.  The same goes for minorities.  Even today in a country that prides itself on “equality” is it extremely rampant that not everyone is created exactly equal.  People still hold onto stereotypes about minorities that impacts the way they view them and the same goes for women and men.  While it seems that white men have been more privileged, according to the U.S. history books, there is equality issues even among them.

By viewing people certain ways by grouping them into categories, it is a never ending battle for equality.  Men can have similar and different qualities to women just as minorities can be relatable to people around them.  What is equality (in the U.S.)?  Is it a term defined by men or specifically white men?  What is “equality” to other cultures?  There is not one single answer and that viewpoint, in my opinion, should be accepted.

1 comment:

  1. Erin, you make so many good points here. With respect to the historical dominance of men over women, I have often thought this is the case because women allow and enable it to be so. Kimmel suggests that masculinity is measured by other men, but I would also make the point that women subscribe to the constructed definition as much as men do. I’ve observed how differently my women friends treat their sons versus daughters. The American mother seems to be a willing participant in creating the standard by which men are measured.

    ReplyDelete